b4b: Update to cime version that fixes the check_input_data --download issue #3647
+2
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ekluzek
added
enhancement
github-project-automation
bot
moved this to Ready to start (or start again)
in CTSM: Upcoming tags
ekluzek
moved this from Ready to start (or start again)
to In progress - b4b-dev
in CTSM: Upcoming tags
ekluzek
added
the
priority: high
Contributor
|
@ekluzek this has a beta08 milestone. Is that still the correct timeline? |
Use the cime tag now that the PR was merged
Collaborator
Author
|
@wwieder not a thing critical to get in for beta08, but something we do need to soon, because it does cause problems with new files in inputdata. So for someone running on other machines besides Derecho and Izumi. |
Conflicts: .gitmodules cime
Collaborator
Author
|
I ran the testing here, and it's as expected. b4b-dev had a fieldlist difference already in place that I saw. NEON tests had a glitch downloading data, but that was it. |
slevis-lmwg
approved these changes
Jan 16, 2026
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from In progress - b4b-dev
to In progress - master
in CTSM: Upcoming tags
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from In progress - master
to Done (non release/external)
in CTSM: Upcoming tags
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from In Progress
to Done
in LMWG: Sprint Planning Board
slevis-lmwg
added a commit
to slevis-lmwg/ctsm
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2026
Merge b4b-dev to master - Change some _U and _R history fields to be on by default PR ESCOMP#3667 by Keith Oleson - Update to cime version that fixes the check_input_data --download issue PR ESCOMP#3647 by Erik Kluzek; ESCOMP#3647 updated to cime6.1.145, while updating b4b-dev to master in this PR gets us to cime6.1.146. - Initial fixes to generate_gdd20_baseline PR ESCOMP#3543 - Decomp mod unittest PR ESCOMP#3699
slevis-lmwg
added a commit
to slevis-lmwg/ctsm
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2026
Merge b4b-dev to master - Change some _U and _R history fields to be on by default PR ESCOMP#3667 by Keith Oleson - Update to cime version that fixes the check_input_data --download issue PR ESCOMP#3647 by Erik Kluzek; ESCOMP#3647 updated to cime6.1.145, while updating b4b-dev to master in this PR gets us to cime6.1.146. - Initial fixes to generate_gdd20_baseline PR ESCOMP#3543 - Decomp mod unittest PR ESCOMP#3699
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
Just updates to the cime branch that fixes the check_input_data --download issue.
Specific notes
Contributors other than yourself, if any: @jedwards4b
CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? No
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No
Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? No No
Testing performed, if any: Tried check_input_data --download on Izumi on the Ciso answer changing branch to show it could successfully retrieve the missing carbon isotope files